Current, Target, and the gap
An Organizational Profile describes the organisation's cybersecurity posture in terms of Core outcomes. A Current Profile says what is being achieved today; a Target Profile says what is needed. The gap between them is the action plan.
Why it is like this
It turns an abstract taxonomy into a prioritised list of specific, costed changes owned by named people — which is the only form in which a framework ever survives contact with a budget.
Not to be confused with
A maturity assessment. There is no score and no overall rating; a Profile is a statement about outcomes, and two organisations with identical Current Profiles can reasonably have completely different Targets.
In practice
NIST's own steps: scope the Profile, gather what you need, create the Current, create the Target, analyse the gap and build an action plan, then implement and update.
Source: The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0, NIST CSWP 29 (26 February 2024) — CSF 2.0 §3. Read on .
Predict Check yourself
An organisation completes a Current Profile and stops, reporting "CSF assessment complete". What has it not produced?
Show the answer
A Target Profile, and therefore the gap analysis and action plan that are the point of the exercise.
A Current Profile on its own describes where you are and recommends nothing. Half the method is the half that costs money.